Re: [PATCH 3/3] rebase: refuse to rebase with -s ours

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Thomas Rast wrote:

> Using the "ours" strategy with rebase just discards all changes, turning 
> <branch> into <upstream> (or <newbase> if given).  This is unlikely to 
> be what the user wants, so simply refuse to do it.

"Unlikely" or "impossible"?

Besides, I find it rather arbitrary that the "ours" strategy is refused, 
but none of the user-provided merge strategies.  IOW disallowing "ours" 
may very well foster unreasonable expectations.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]