Re: [PATCH 2/2] pack documentation review updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Update Scott's protocol document according to review comments given by Junio.
>>
>>  * name of "%00" byte is NUL not null;
>> ...
>>  * don't unnecessarily say "SHOULD NOT" when existing servers can satisify
>>   "MUST NOT";
>> ...
>
> I was _just_ working on this yesterday and had gotten about halfway
> through - I'm traveling a lot right now, so I'm a bit behind.  This
> looks good, thanks for taking the time Nanako.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, both.

I had some doubts about the "SHOULD NOT"/"MUST" on obj-id myself, but if
you are Ok with the change, I wouldn't complain ;-).

Will squash this in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]