The 12/11/09, rhlee wrote: > Nicolas Sebrecht-3 wrote: > > > >> Yes I know I probably should not be > >> working like this. My branches should be wholly independent. But I doing > >> web > >> development not kernel development so there is much less modularity and > >> branches/features have a tendency to creep into one another. > > > > This should not be the case. Modularity in the release process and the > > development strategy is not tied to "what I am developing". I'm doing > > some web development too and have no difficulty around this point. > > Just to clarify. Do you mean that this should not be the case that you get > feature creep in branches or the fact that this happens does interfere with > your release process/development strategy. I mean that the independency of the feature branches is mostly relying on "what do I (as a developer) commit in this branch", which is really tied to "how to write nice atomic commits" (easily reversible, etc). This must be applicable whatever the product/software you're working on and it is applicable for web development too. -- Nicolas Sebrecht -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html