Re: git replace woes: dirty stat with clean workdir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On mardi 10 novembre 2009, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> when cooking up a "warning example" for git replace (don't draw
> premature conclusions when there are replaced objects) I came across the
> following problem: git status seems to compare the work dir with the
> tree of HEAD, not the replacing tree. Even deleting the index does not
> help.

Yeah, you are right. I must say that I never tested replacing trees before.

> [ The example also shows that we need a way to specify
> --no-replace-objects for gitk. Would easier if gitk really where git
> something. ]

Yeah, I think --no-replace-objects might not work well for shell scripts or 
even commands that call other commands using run_command(). Perhaps we need 
an environment variable GIT_NO_REPLACE_OBJECTS to be set by commands that 
are passed --no-replace-objects and checked by all the commands. I will 
have a look at that.

Thanks,
Christian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]