* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > * Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > [Footnote] > > > > *1* To spell it out... The people who are in the "hate > > chain-reply-to very much" camp would have already done their own > > configuration to get the behaviour they want by now, so changing the > > default would not help them much, while potentially hurting "love > > chain-reply-to" people who have been content because they got what > > they wanted without setting any configuration. > > Stupid question: i researched the Git mailing list archive (and read > the link you provided) and found no arguments (at all) in favor of the > nested chaining. Are you aware of any? Btw., dont get me wrong - i'm perfectly happy with the fix in 1.7.0. You are also right that behavioral changes dont belong into stable releases. ( I'm just seeing this problem through the biased eyes of someone who is affected by it, so i naturally want to have the benefit of the change ASAP - without fully perceiving the risks of the change.) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html