Re: What will happen to git.git in the near future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> The problem is that the Makefile does not realize that Git.xs no longer is 
> there. Neither does the code which recreates the Makefile.

No. The problem is that top-level dependency rules for perl/Makefile are 
simply _wrong_. It claims it depends on some things (which is true), but 
then it totally ignores _other_ things that it also depends on.

Further, even if it was right, the rules to actually _generate_ the 
Makefile then seems wrong, in that it cares about files it shouldn't care 
about in the first place.

So why do that at all? Why accept such crap?

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]