On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > Heya, > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 01:19, Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I didn't understand the version of my patch that contains your changes, > > and I didn't know what was in it. > > Either way, I managed to apply your patch, will send a new version of > the series tomorrow. Does it make sense now in what it's trying to do? (And does it turn out to work?) I'm fairly certain it's the easiest way to make the remote appear most natural to the rest of git, but I don't actually have code that wants to use it, so I wouldn't know if this just wouldn't work for hg or something. > > I don't know why Junio squashed your > > changes into my patch, particularly when I disagreed with those changes. > > Junio didn't squash anything, it's just that pu still contains v4 of > the series, in which I had squashed my changes in. Oh, okay. You probably shouldn't squash un-acked changes into other people's patches when taking over their series. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html