Re: [PATCH 4/4] win32: Improve the conditional inclusion of WIN32 API code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt wrote:
> It may be that I understand something incorrectly; but then I blame the
> justification that you gave. In this case, it would be helpful to reword
> the commit message, and perhaps add some results from your experiments.
> 

The discussion which lead to this patch, including the experiments, can be
found in the email thread starting here:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/129403

(along with some other unrelated stuff; but it's not a long read :)

In the above thread, Marius suggested API_WIN32, but I switched it around, since
I thought it sounded better! I also thought about GIT_WIN32. Suggestions?

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]