Erick Mattos <erick.mattos@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2009/10/30 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> ... >>> I agree that the issue the patch addresses is worth improving, and I think >>> it is sensible to default to reuse the timestamp for -C and not to reuse >>> for --amend. I am not sure about -c myself, but it probably shouldn't >>> reuse the timestamp by default. >> >> So after realizing that this was about "author" timestamp, I am rescinding >> this comment about the change of the default for -c and --amend. > > Actually I am only changing the default for -c and I see it useful. > At least with me I normally use -c only to use messages of commits as > template. I do that from time to time as well. As I said in a different message, it may make the default more intutitive if we give new timestamp when the author is the same as the committer when doing "-c". You are creating your own commit in that case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html