[cc'ing git@vger and quoting excessively to give those readers context] On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 05:59:03PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Am Fr den 30. Okt 2009 um 17:28 schrieb Gerrit Pape: > > > The most recent git in debian has a broken ignore handling. Let me > > > show > > > it on a example: > > > > mkdir gittest > > > > cd gittest > > > > git init > > > > touch a > > > > git add a > > > > git commit -m commit > > > > git ls-files -i --exclude-standard > > > > > > The last command will show the file a (as it would show every file as > > > being ignored, every which is in the index!). But that command should > > > show nothing at that point. > > > > Hi Klaus, it looks like upstream did that on purpose > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=commit;h=b5227d80 > > > > $ git describe --contains b5227d80 > > v1.6.5.2~2^2^2 It was not exactly on purpose. The point of that change was that "git ls-files" should also show things mentioned in the .gitignore, because .gitignore has nothing to do whatsoever with tracked files. But I simply forgot about "git ls-files -i", so changing it was an unintended side effect (and sadly, we don't seem to have any regression tests for it). > That makes the whole sense of -i ad absurdum (I do not know how to tell > "ad absurdum" in english). With that patch there is no way anymore to > see if some ignored files are accidentally committed. Yes, with the current code "-i" serves no purpose unless you are using "-o". > I have to use git often as frontend for that broken design (svn). So to > hold the ignores up2date I use "git svn show-ignore > .gitignore" But > many, many repositories have broken ignores so I have to check it with > "git ls-files -i --exclude-standard" to see if there is accidentally > ignored files. Well, that patch makes that impossible at all! Just to be clear: nothing is actually broken about ignores that cover tracked files. Ignores are (and have been since long before this patch) purely about untracked files. So there is no problem at all with: $ echo content >foo $ git add foo $ echo foo >.gitignore $ git commit The _only_ thing that respected such ignores was "git ls-files", and the point of the patch in question was to fix that. > So I think, this patch is a bug at all! > > I add Jeff (and Junio as he did the commit) to the Cc. @Jeff and or > Junio: could you please revoke that patch? I am not sure simply reverting is the best choice; the patch does do something useful. And while it strictly breaks backwards compatibility on the output without "-i", the old behavior was considered a bug. But the "-i" behavior is useless now, so we need to figure out how to proceed. We can: 1. Revert and accept that the behavior is historical. Callers need to work around it by dropping --exclude* when invoking ls-files. 2. Declare "-i" useless, deprecate and/or remove. Obviously this is also breaking existing behavior, but again, I don't think that using "-i" actually accomplishes anything. 3. Revert for now, and then reinstate the patch during a major version bump when we are declaring some compatibility breakages. 4. Re-work "-i" to show tracked but ignored files, but still show all files when "-i" is not given at all. I think (4) preserves the benefit of the patch in question, but still allows your usage ("git ls-files -i --exclude-standard"). I do question whether that usage is worth supporting. Certainly I wouldn't implement it if I were writing git-ls-files from scratch today, but we do in general try to maintain backwards compatibility, especially for plumbing like ls-files. Junio, what do you want to do? -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html