Re: [PATCH] mergetool--lib: add p4merge as a pre-configured mergetool option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Markus Heidelberg
<markus.heidelberg@xxxxxx> wrote:
> He didn't mean p4merge on other platforms, but other merge tools on Mac
> OS X. What about all the other merge tools already in mergetool--lib?
> Should they get special handling, too?

If someone wants to scratch that itch, then yes. The default diff tool
for OS X has its helper already in /usr/bin (opendiff). p4merge is
arguably a better merge tool, and it installs as an app bundle in
/Applications. I'm not sure about the other diff tools, I haven't
looked.

> And for Windows we could add C:\Program Files\MergeToolX\tool.exe for
> every merge tool.

If it makes those tools easier to use with git, and if someone on
Windows wants to scratch that itch, then yes, we should.

> But where will we end?

I don't understand this argument. It's a few lines of code to make git
a little friendlier. We end when folks stop contributing patches
because either no one cares of there's nothing left to improve.

j.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]