On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> > >> As suggested in the mailing list, now I've replaced all instances of 'fast >> forward' with 'fast-forward'. > > I had an impression that the consensus from the previous > discussion was that there is no such consensus that this > is an improvement, because there isn't a clear-cut rule? I don't think anyone wants to preserve the current inconsistent use, and I haven't seen arguments in favor of 'fast forward' either. My understanding was that the comments were in favor of 'fast-forward' but making it consistent across the code-base: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125532404330701&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125535210203730&w=2 -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html