Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Robin Rosenberg
<robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> söndag 27 september 2009 14:24:32 skrev Anteru <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Mercurial's revision number system: With git, I get an SHA1 hash for
>> every commit, but it's not possible to see whether Hash1 is newer than
>> Hash2, while Mecurial also adds a running number to each commit. What's
>
> But those numbers cannot be communicated since they are local to your
> clone.

You can use git-describe, which will look for the latest tag, and make
a combo of latest tag, commits since the tag, short form of sha1. So
you get "v1.6.3-33-g1234" - 33 commits after 1.6.3. Works very well to
integrate in versioning. The git project itself uses it in the
Makefile to set the versions, same as the kernel folk do -- I use it
to version even RPM/DEBs.

hth,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]