Matthew L Foster wrote:
--- A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sounds like you're suggesting that Git should not record any timestamps
at all. After all, Git doesn't need them.
Yeah kind of, since distributed git doesn't need timestamps and can't guarantee them the only time
that might make any sense to use locally is local commit time.
There is no local commit time for things you get from a remote repository.
When I wrote "Sounds like you're suggesting that Git should not record
any timestamps at all", I meant _you_ don't think Git should record
_any_ timestamps since they can't be guaranteed to match the DAG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html