On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:45:22AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Declaring it a failure depends on what you consider the goal of "git > remote update" to be. I find it very useful as a shorthand for "fetch > from _all_ remotes"[1]. Which does save typing over > > [...] > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:22:35AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> *1* The only thing "git remote update" does that "git fetch" does not >> is that it can serve as "fetch from everywhere" shorthand. But that >> is something we could have added to "git fetch". So in that sense, I >> think it may make even more sense to deprecate "remote update" and >> teach "fetch" how to do that. ...and it would probably help if I had read your footnotes before responding. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html