Hi, On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Or am I worrying too much? > > > > No, I think your concerns are valid, we should go with (2) and DTRT. > > Does the updated patch address your concerns? If so I can send a new > > version. > > Assuming the internal blame algorithm correctly works with such an > input, I'd be happier with an approach to allow users to tell the > difference. The --porcelain output was designed to be extensible, and it > might make sense to show the "this line is incomplete" as a separate > bit, though. Sorry, you lost me. If, say, line 614 is the last line that does not end in a new line, if I ask for it to be blamed, I want to know who is responsible for the current form of line 614. Not whether the line ends in a new line or not. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html