--- Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > --- Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I think that this need some thinking over. For blob we have two > > >> "base" objects: tree which have specified blob, and commit which > > >> have tree which have specified blob. We might want to specify > > >> that all hash*base are to the commit-ish. > > > > > > Agreed, we should always refer to the commit-ish, for obvious > > > reasons. > > > > > > This patch doesn't make this decision though. It simply > > > sets hash_base to HEAD if not defined. > > > > > > Now, since "git-ls-tree" works on both commit-ish and > > > tree-ish, we are ok. > > > > I think so, too. Jakub? > > Status? I see Jakub hasn't objected, and it is really important > for us to be able to link to "latest" binary blob -- for example > a PDF spec file. Junio, What are the objections to this patch? Thanks, Luben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html