Re: git-push of new, tiny branch doing more work than necessary?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:40:41 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> I hope this started working again because we fixed it this time.  Two
> bugs were fixed in this area.  First any branch names over about 40
> characters in length were being ignored completely due to a validation
> bug.  Second in an attempt to ensure we didn't bust the 900 entry
> command line limit for rev-list we were restricting ourselves to 16
> remote refs as possible bases.  master now has these changes in it and I
> am no longer seeing this behavior.

Aha! Thanks.

It doesn't appear I had the 40-character ref problem, nor was I
exceeding the 900 ref limit. But I was definitely well over the 16 ref
limit.

> >> git version 1.4.2.rc2.gef1d9
> >
> > Please try a more recent version (yours is from Jul 27).

I updated as soon as I got your reply, but just waited until I hit a
repeat of the use case today, (I was just too lazy to try to roll
things back and duplicate the exact same conditions).

Sure enough, things seem to be much better now (git version
1.4.2.1.g16fd), so thanks for the fix.

-Carl

Attachment: pgpiJ3HppSpBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]