Junio C Hamano schrieb: > René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Junio C Hamano schrieb: >>> I mentioned an idea to enhance the pretty=format language with a >>> string function syntax that people can extend by adding new functions >>> in one of the "What's cooking" messages earlier. The general syntax >>> would be like >>> >>> %[function(args...)any string here%] >>> >>> where "any string here" part would have the usual pretty=format >>> strings. E.g. git show -s --format='%{w(72,8,4)%s%+b%]' should give >>> you a line wrapped commit log message if w(width,in1,in2) is such a >>> function. >> I pondered line wrapping with format strings briefly a long time ago, and >> I always considered it to be more similar to a colour, i.e. a state that >> one can change and that is applied to all following text until the next >> state change. (Except that it's always reset at the end of the format >> string.) The example above would then turn into '%w(72,8,4)%s%+b'. > > As a syntax to express "wrapping" behaviour alone, I think this is much > simpler and more superiour. I guess with this if you want to wrap > something to 72 columns and then wrap something else to 66 columns, you > would write '%w(72,8,4)something%w(66,8,4)something else', right? That's right. > I used %] only for two reasons. > > - Without an explicit "here it ends", I couldn't come up with a good way > to express '%[w(72,8,4)something%]something else'. IOW, how I can say > "wrap something to 72 columns and then place something else without any > wrapping"? My patch makes '%w()' reset the wrapping parameters to their defaults. > - When we need to support more than one string function like this, it is > unclear what '%f()one string%g()another one' in your syntax means. > Does it mean '%[f()one string%]%[g()another one%]' (i.e. concatenate > the result of applying string function f to 'one string' and the result > of applying string function g to 'another one')? Or does it mean > '%[f()one string%[g()another one%]%]' (apply 'f' to concatenation of > 'one string' and the result of applying 'g' to 'another one')? I was going to say that we already have something like that with %C, and that the natural way (to me) is to apply them both, independently. Case modification functions (upper, lower, capitalized) could be treated the same way -- as state changes (like pressing caps lock when typing text). Which other text functions are we going to add which would break this model? The only thing I can think of right now is nesting such functions themselves, e.g. when indenting a list in an indented sub-paragraph in an indented paragraph. Useful? But then something else hit me: the line wrap function needs to consider colour codes as having a length of zero. Ugh. René -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html