Re: [PATCH RFC] git describe without refs distinguishes dirty working tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yea, 1.7 may be safer for this, but also many scripts are based
> on the GIT-VERSION-GEN in git.git which uses HEAD as an explicit
> argument.  So they might actually be OK with this change.

Well, from my cursory look of its scripts/setlocalversion, even the Linux
kernel is not safe X-<.

I still haven't heard anything that helps me to decide which way the
default should be.  The only concrete thing I have heard against the
change of the default is that it will break existing setup, but I haven't
heard anything concrete for the change yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]