Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:08:59PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> IMHO this patch proposed by Daniel about the detached head is probably a 
> good compromise.  It makes "confusing" operations more verbose to give 
> new users a better feeling while keeping the flexibility intact.  And 
> increased verbosity is less annoying than decreased flexibility.

And I don't think there is as much opposition to a config option to
silence verbosity, because it isn't really a change in behavior. We
already have advice.*, and if the new message is too annoying, we can
get advice.commitDetachedHead.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]