Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:34:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> AFAIR we still remember HEAD to be a symlink.
> >
> > I think that has been abandoned for detached HEAD (that is, if you
> > support only symlinked HEAD, then you cannot detach at all). But I might
> > be wrong. It has been a while since I looked at that code.
> 
> If I understand what Daniel is doing correctly, the idea is to keep this
> extra information only while the HEAD is detached, no?  "HEAD itself
> could be a symlink" is an irrelevant issue, isn't it?

Right. That is what I was trying to say, but somehow it didn't come out
very clearly.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]