On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Matthew L Foster <mfoster167@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How does git ensure that the timestamp in a commit records when it was actually created? I am not > saying throw away creation time, just that local time is more preferable and relevant and > git/gitweb.cgi should not in any way depend on time being configured correctly on each and every The time stamp held in each Git commit accurately records the system time of the machine on which it was created. That's about the only guarantee offered. The vast majority of the time this accurately records the proper time. In the rare case when the system time is set incorrectly Git will "accurately" record this value. The good news is that Git continues to work without any problem even if this happens. Hopefully, you can put your mind at ease over that issue. > git server. I think users of kernel.org's repo (or web interface) care more about when change X > was commited to it than when an author created/emailed change X, but perhaps I am wrong or don't > understand git or both. Well no, the time each commit was actually created and imported into its initial repository is also interesting to people. But I happen to agree with you that it would be nice to _also_ show the time that each commit appeared in the kernel.org repo. Unfortunately, the way Git is designed this just isn't easy. In fact, Junio has gone so far as to dare everyone not to even try to implement that feature. So we might just have to accept that we'll never see that information on kernel.org. You will likely become a lot more comfortable with this, the more you get to know and use Git. Perhaps playing with gitk is worthwhile, as Linus suggested. Hopefully you can let this issue go, at least until you've played with git some more. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html