On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Sal Mangano
<smangano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2) I can use Git unchanged but preserve order by storing some
information in
each sub tree (e.g. an extra blob) which retains the real order. I
can also
This #2 is your best bet by far. An extra blob in each subdir is just
one option, you can handle this "extra metadata" in a number of ways
-- maybe external to git, on a separate history will work best.
The downsides of messing with internal tree handling of git are so
staggering that you'd do better to throw git away.
(this is from experience of abusing git to various purposes that have
little to do with version control :-) )
In other words: Shaun and Dscho are right, so right that it hurts.
Thanks Martin. I suspect you, Shaun and Dscho are correct. But, can
anyone point to specific code
that would allow me to see first hand that this is hopeless. So far,
based on the code I looked at, I see
it as problematic but not hopeless. Here I define "problematic" as
having to change a few files and/or
avoid using some features while "hopeless" meaning I'd have to change
almost very single plumbing
command.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html