When saying the initial branch is equal to the currently active remote branch, it is probably intended that the branch heads point to the same commit. Maybe it would be more useful to a new user to emphasize that the tree contents and history are the same. More important, probably, is that this new branch is set up so that "git pull" merges changes from the corresponding remote branch. The next paragraph addresses that directly, but clarifying the initial content of the branch should make it clearer why a pull is required at all (that local and remote branches each have their own history after the clone). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/git-clone.txt | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt index aacf4fd..7cd06e2 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ DESCRIPTION Clones a repository into a newly created directory, creates remote-tracking branches for each branch in the cloned repository (visible using `git branch -r`), and creates and checks out an initial -branch equal to the cloned repository's currently active branch. +branch with the contents of the cloned repository's currently active +branch. After the clone, a plain `git fetch` without arguments will update all the remote-tracking branches, and a `git pull` without -- 1.6.5.rc1.199.g596ec -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html