On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So that could probably be ripped out, too, with no ill effect. > > And here is a patch (on top of the earlier one) to do that. Alright, so I'm spinning a new version of this series, and I'm wondering a bit how to include patches like these, where there's no commit message (because it was a sketch or something, I guess) or sign-off. Should I send the commit-messages to the author and have the him/her sign off on them, or should I set me as author and credit the real author for the actual work in the commit message? I see the latter have been done quite a bit in git.git already. The benefit of the first one is of course that authorship is retained, but the backside is that it incorrectly looks like the author wrote the commit message. Are there any preferences? -- Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx (+47) 986 59 656 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html