Re: [PATCH] Test for correct behaviour on %B(1) and %B(-1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Gilger <heipei@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> seeing as the %B-patch is in your pu you seem to be almost happy with it.

Being in 'pu' does not mean that much; it just means that I do not want to
lose the patch and nothing more.  I'll squash the test in anyway.

We may want to build on this further to cover Dscho's line-wrap but that
is independent of this addition.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]