Re: [PATCH] Teach 'rebase -i' the command "amend"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/10/4 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>:
> I thought that we had a discussion about this and that the consensus was
> that "amend" would be misleading.  Maybe you can find that thread in
> GMane?

I found this thread from January 2009:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/105738

Having read the thread, I agree that "amend" would be misleading.

There were several suggestions for alternate command names
in that thread, for example:

"msg", "msgedit", "message", "reword", "rephrase"

It think that "msgedit" was suggested by several people. ("editmsg"
was also suggested, but it is not possible as the abbreviation "e" would
become ambiguous.)

Would the patch have a chance to be accepted if I renamed
the new command to "msgedit"?

/Björn

-- 
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]