On 2009-10-02, at 4:39 AM, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:01:34AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 => 100755 t/t5531-deep-submodule-push.sh
mode change 100644 => 100755 t/t9501-gitweb-standalone-http-
status.sh
diff --git a/t/t5531-deep-submodule-push.sh b/t/t5531-deep-
submodule-push.sh
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
diff --git a/t/t9501-gitweb-standalone-http-status.sh
b/t/t9501-gitweb-standalone-http-status.sh
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
When applying via "am", I only got the first change in my tree.
I'll see
if I can confirm and make a test case.
Ah, nevermind. The problem is that your patch was word-wrapped, making
the second "diff --git" line bogus. It would have been nice to have it
print a warning instead of silently ignoring that bit of the patch.
I didn't have format=flowed buggering things up this time, so I don't
quite understand the problem; could you please explain with more
details?
When I try to apply the patch from a saved copy of the e-mail, I get
the following error:
# git am ~/Downloads/\[PATCH\]\ tests_\ make\ all\ test\ files\
executable.eml
Patch format detection failed.
zsh: exit 1 git am
The difference between the patch created by format-patch and the saved
e-mail is just some e-mail header information. Is that a different error
than what you were getting? I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here, help
would be appreciated.
--
Mark Rada (ferrous26)
marada@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html