Re: [PATCH v3] Trivial fix: Make all the usage strings to use the same pattern.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What does this _fix_?
The answer here is nothing. But I think the benefit is to a have a
pattern, but if it is _not_ desired, I can stop here.

> I see v2 and v3 were posted 15 minutes apart.  People need to check both
> to see what changed, and that also adds to the cost.
>
> Please slow down.
I sent the v3 to fix my mistake: api-builtin.txt to api-parse-options.txt
You are right, I have to slow down here.
>
> I do not mean "please slow down working on your patch, and instead spend
> time somewhere else".  I mean "please spend more time rre-re-re-reviewing
> what you are going to send."  If you did so, externally it would look as
> if you slowed down ;-).
As I said above, I can stop here if this is not a good change.

> Among the topics that are cooking in 'next', at least builtin-commit.c and
> fast-import.c have changes to overlapping areas this huge patch touches.
> At least, exclude the changes to them from this patch, and make patches
> separately for them.  That would make the cost of conflict resolution
> slightly smaller.  You need to also check with 'pu', but writing this
> response has already made me exceed my git time for today.
If the answer above is yes (I can continue), I will separate it in a
bunch of commits(patches)  and I will check more careful before submit
another patch here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]