Josh Triplett schrieb: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> How about '--output -' instead? > > Yeah, that seems significantly better than --force. Though I don't > particularly care for the '-' convention to mean 'stdout'; in principle > that ought to create a file named '-' in the current directory. > /dev/stdout makes more sense, and doesn't require any work on git's > part beyond this patch. Except that /dev/stdout is not portable. You can always say --output ./- if you want an oddly named file in the current directory. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html