After seeing how git currently accepts a remote repository's timestamp it occurred to me that git should probably instead prefer the time a particular changeset was committed to _this_ repository. Perhaps I don't know enough about git but it seems to me the important information is when a particular changeset was committed to this repository, all other remote/sub/parent repositories' timestamps are secondary (or at least should be tracked separately). -Matt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html