Re: [PATCH 2/2] remove NORETURN from function pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Erik Faye-Lund schrieb:
>> Compiling the following code gives a warning about unreachable code,
>> so it's clear that msvc doesn't simply ignore the directive. I'm not
>> saying that anyone suggested otherwise, I just wanted to know for
>> sure.
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> void (*exit_fun)(int) = exit;
>> void __declspec(noreturn) die(void);
>> void die(void) { exit_fun(1); }
>> int main(void) { printf("hello!\n"); die(); printf("world!\n"); }
>
> In order to countermand any clever optimizations you should make it
>
> -void (*exit_fun)(int) = exit;
> +extern void (*exit_fun)(int);
>
> (of course, this fails to link). But if this results in only *one* warning
> (that the printf() call is unreachable), then I wouldn't bother with this
> problem anymore, because you really should also have been warned that a
> __declspec(noreturn) function actually does return.

Ah, good point. Still gives the warning (as well as the linker-error), though.

-- 
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund
kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx
(+47) 986 59 656
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]