Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> What you have here is precisely what we observed. But I think one of the
> complaints was to say more explicitly "that ref doesn't exist on the
> remote", which I think should be the case if we have got to this point
> (anything else would have triggered an error in fetch).
Wouldn't you get into the situation with this?
[remote "origin"]
fetch = refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/next
I think saying "does not exist" will repeat the same mistake of
overguessing you are trying to rectify.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html