Re: [PATCH] git-push: Accept -n as a synonym for --dry-run.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ..., so you are not arguing against
> me at all.
> ... it is likely that we would try very
> hard to find a name that does not begin with 'n' to avoid the issue.

So what's my objection, in short?

It is just the wording "_the_ standard" that implies that anything that
uses -n to mean something other than --dry-run is _wrong_.

I didn't want to see anybody arguing against "commit -n".  It is used to
defeat pre-commit hook and has been there with us for a long time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]