Alexandre Julliard <julliard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I do not know all the details of how Emacs keybinding works, but I had an >> impression that something-x sequence is triggered if you type something-X >> and you do not have an explicit binding for something-X but you do have a >> binding for something-x. >> >> IOW, if I only have >> >> (define-key global-map "\C-xc" 'compile) >> >> then both "\C-xc" and "\C-xC" runs "compile", but in addition to the >> above if I also have >> >> (define-key global-map "\C-xC" 'grep-find) >> >> then I can invoke these two commands with lower- and upper- case 'c/C' >> after control-x. >> >> If people have been relying on the historical behaviour that typing "R" >> marked the path resolved (which may internally have been implemented with >> whatever way), and if you are removing that binding, wouldn't that now >> expose them to whatever happens to be bound to "r"? > > No, I don't claim to understand exactly how that works for the C-x case, > but it doesn't apply here, "r" and "R" are two different bindings. Thanks. I just wanted to make sure that a user who is used to typing "R" won't get the file removed with the new code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html