Re: [PATCHv5 00/14] git notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Furthermore, the following notes tree structures were tested:
>
> - "no-notes": Testing without any notes at all. This is only present as a
>   baseline, and to verify that the notes code does not negatively affect
>   performance when not in use.

Minor nit.

For this to be a baseline, you would need to have another algorithm before
"before", i.e., without any of these notes implementation.

Comparison with "before" alone is not meaningful.  That is like starting
with a state with unknown performance regression compared to the stock
version, and then boast improvements made by various variations.

You would need to compare overhead of various "algorithms" with the stock
git in "no-notes" case as well.  It would give us the true performance
cost of supporting notes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]