Re: Strange merge failure (would be overwritten by merge / cannot merge)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>...
>>  * traverse_trees() takes a callback from the caller in info->fn().  It
>>    feeds the callback the entries with the same name most of the time, but
>>    that is not a guarantee, and the bug we are seeing is coming from a
>>    caller, unpack_trees_callback(), assuming it.
>
> This is the level I'm looking at. In fact, I'm going to cheat. I'm not 
> going to do it when we call info->fn(), I'm going to do it _before_ the 
> call, and have a special "find conflicts" phase inside traverse_trees() 
> itself.
>
> That way, any traverse_trees() user will see the conflicts exactly like 
> they used to, because I'm just going to add a special "find conflicts" 
> phase there that does the right thing. It's a hack, but it's a "useful" 
> hack, and it at least avoids being the current "it can't work for the 
> special case" thing.
> ...
> I think I have a good solution, give me half an hour to actually get it to 
> work.

Thanks.

The reason I brought up adding the "candidate for the earliest name"
interface to the function was to avoid a case where the index has

    blob "t"
    blob "t-f"

and all the trees being merged have

    blob "t-f"
    tree "t"

in which case the "Are we supposed to look at the index too?" logic in
unpack_callback() may not catch the "t-f" entry from the index when the
first callback from traverse_trees() feeds it "t-f".  It would notice that
the entry at o->pos is "t".  When that happens, I did not think of a clean
way to avoid the codepath from emitting "t" as "only exists in the index".
With the "candidate" addition, traverse_trees() could say "You asked me
that I may have to return 't' to you, and here are the entries from all
the trees." before giving "t-f" back.

Other than that, I think find_conflicts() phase in the traverse_trees()
makes sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]