On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:58:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I assume you mean "ls-files". I have every once in a while been annoyed > > by that, but given how infrequently I run ls-files, it is not a big > > deal. :) > > I did mean ls-tree, but I misspelled the name of the escape hatch. Oh, I never noticed that behavior before. For "ls-files", I think it is at least a little sane, but it makes no sense whatsoever for ls-tree. > At this moment (as my brain is not quite functioning), I can only say we > agreed to disagree what feels more natural here. I agree that we agreed to disagree. But there is still one open question: would you take a patch for a "full-tree" config variable that would impact add (and probably grep) for 1.7.0? You can sleep on it if you want. ;) -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html