Re: [PATCH 0/8] VCS helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This is the next version of the db/vcs-helper series in pu.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > The first patch is new, a rework of the remote-curl build to produce
> > "remote-curl" and call it as a special case for the sorts of URLs that
> > we accept as indicating something that it now handled by this helper.
> >
> > The series is rebased onto current next, with some conflicts resolved.
> 
> Because the theme of the topic does not have anything to do with fixing
> the deepening of shallow clones nor giving an extended error message from
> non-fast-forward git-push, I queued the series after reverse-rebasing onto
> old db/vcs-helper~8, in order to keep the topic branch pure, instead of
> merging unrelated topics from maint, master or next into it.  The result
> merged in 'pu' obviously has to match what you expected by applying the
> patches on top of 'next', and I am reasonably sure it does.

I'd thought that topics in pu were carried as based on next, particularly 
once they depend on something (e.g., the beginning of the series) in next. 
I suppose there's better options, but what do you do to find them? (Feel 
free to refer me to the "note from the maintainer" if it's there, but I 
don't remember that detail)

FWIW, there was a semantic mismerge in the original basing of this series 
on 07a4a3b496, which I finally fixed in this version; the code to handle 
NULL urls in builtin-fetch was after a new conversion of the url.

In any case, I think both the reverse-rebase and merge are correct.

> > Two patches have been dropped: a memory leak fix for code that was
> > removed entirely by the first patch, and the "mark" helper capability,
> > which is not needed (I believe) due to the "option" fast-import command.
> 
> Johan's cvs-helper series were depending on the previous iteration of this
> series, but I thought it is being rerolled, so I'd drop it from pu for now.

You could probably stick the "mark" patch into the start of the cvs-helper 
series until it gets rerolled if you want to keep that series in pu 
meanwhile; it was at the end of the series, and doesn't have subtle 
interactions or interact with anything that's changed.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]