On Tue, 01 Sep 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sadly, "keep related things together" and "as close to the bottom as > possible" are not quite compatible, and we can pick one or the other, but > not both. > > If I were to pick the middle ground, I would probably move it immediately > after the call to wt_status_print_changed(), with "keeping related things > together" as the primary justification. It would be an incidental benefit > that it moves the part slightly closer to the bottom and gives it a better > chance of staying on the screen. I can only speak of my personal experience that during rebase -i, there is no (or very few) untracked files in the list so that the sequence "modified, unmerged, untracked" is also a good alternative. (I hope the mail-followup-to is correct this time) -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html