david.hagood@xxxxxxxxx writes: > I have a project that is committing several XML files into GIT, and we > have a problem when doing merges. > > The files are UML XMI 1.1 files generated by a UML tool (specifically > Enterprise Architect by Sparx), and EA "helpfully" puts things like > timestamps of modification and access into the files. As you can guess, > these are conflict-magnets. Yes, the ideal solution would be to turn that > off, and I am pursuing that avenue within EA. > > However, it seems to me that if there were some way to plug into GIT's > merging logic, it would be possible to design an XML aware merging tool > that might help on this (generalizing: if you could have content-aware > merging libraries you could make all sorts of merges go more smoothly). > For the specific case of an XML file, if you could have some way to denote > tags and/or attributes that are "don't cares" you could address problems > like I am having. You could also theoretically exploit a knowledge of the > format to better identify what chunks are changes and possibly track > motion within the files better. With Git you are able to use custom merge driver for specific files (files specified by glob, which can be all files) by using `merge` gitattribute (it is about file-level merging in the case of file contents conflict). Or you can use 'merge.default' config variable to set merge driver for all files. Also you can set `diff` filter to custom diff driver which ignores timestamps, or even remove timestamps from files when checking them in using `filter` gitattribute (clean / smudge filters). > Absent that, is there a way to tell git "in case of an unresolvable merge > conflict, don't modify the file but put the other version of the file > somewhere (e.g. filename.other) so that I can use an external tool to > resolve the differences"? In this case, EA doesn't know how to use the > standard conflict tags within a file to extract deltas. You can have `merge` attribute unset , e.g *.uml -merge This means "Take the version from the current branch as the tentative merge result, and declare that the merge has conflicts." Also if you have some graphical merge tool, you can consider configuring and using git-mergetool. -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html