Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:04:41AM CEST, I got a letter > where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> said that... >> Petr Baudis wrote: >> >> > Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:34:24AM CEST, I got a letter >> > where Santi <sbejar@xxxxxxxxx> said that... >> >> It could be I'm wrong (for sure, I miss something), but I see the >> >> branches/ files like [remote] sections files with just one fetch: >> >> >> >> .git/branches/git: >> >> git://...../git.gi >> >> >> >> would be: >> >> >> >> [remote "git"] >> >> url=git://...../git.git >> >> fetch=refs/heads/master:refs/heads/git >> > >> > That's basically right, the point is that with moving to remotes >> > support, we will make each remote live in its own separate namespace, >> >> Which is overkill if we fetch only from one directory. > > Why? s/directory/repository/ of course. And as of why: I'd rather have 'next', 'maint, 'html', 'man' in main namespace (with 'origin' substituting 'master') instead of remotes/origin/next etc. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html