Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 05:43:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The main purpose is to allow predictable testing of the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---

Bleh. I just started working on a 4/3 that would test Linus' recent
approxidate changes, but then I realized that this massive date.c
refactoring conflicts with his changes.

I think the most sane thing is to rebase the whole series on top of
lt/approxidate. Let me see what I can do.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]