Re: Question regarding git fetch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 02:44:54PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >   # we usually fetch the remote's master straight into our production
> >   # branch for deployment
> >   $ git config remote.origin.fetch refs/heads/master:refs/heads/production
> >
> >   # but today let's demo it first
> >   $ git fetch origin master:demo
> 
> I think this is a good example that any change results from this
> discussion should apply _only_ to cases where command line refspecs lack
> colon (i.e. used to mean "do not store this anywhere but in FETCH_HEAD").

I don't think the colon is the issue. Consider the same situation, but I
say:

  # but today let's demo it first
  $ git fetch origin master
  $ git checkout -b demo FETCH_HEAD

I'm still screwed. The issue is that you consider your configured
refspec destinations to be precious, and not merely a cache for what's
happening on the remote side.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]