Dear diary, on Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:23:19PM CEST, I got a letter where Gerrit Pape <pape@xxxxxxxxxxx> said that... > Hi, please see http:/bugs.debian.org/387515 or below. I agree that > ideally cg-commit should behave differently. > > Thanks, Gerrit. > > ----- Forwarded message from Andrew Suffield <asuffield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ----- > > cg-commit -p -m ignores the -p argument and silently commits. Yes, > this is documented, but it's still stupid behaviour; if the user had > meant that, they would have just used -m alone. > > At the very least, it should abort with an error (on the basis that > the command makes no sense); more sensibly, it should create a log > message with the given string and then spawn an editor (and then since > the user will probably exit without changing the file, the "Abort or > commit?" message would appear as per usual, which seems to me to be > appropriate behaviour). > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- Thanks, fixed by making cg-commit -p imply -e. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html