On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:31, Johan Herland<johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The 256-tree structure is considerably faster than storing all > > entries in a > > This part is confusing. Was 256-tree better (as in "faster") then? 256-tree is faster than the everything-in-hash_map draft. 16-tree is slightly faster than 256-tree 256-tree uses more memory (in the worst case) that the everything-in-hash-map draft. 16-tree uses less memory than both. Makes sense? ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html