Re: Pulling one commit at a time.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Sanjiv Gupta<sanjiv.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Excellent description. Thanks for that. I want to merge commits one by one
> because I want to run a regression suite on each commit and therefore know
> if any one is causing failures.

Hi Sanjiv,

'git bisect' is an even better way to do this, in my experience.  I
wrote a program (http://github.com/apenwarr/gitbuilder/) that
automatically runs regression tests against all the new versions on
all the new branches.  It then publishes the results on a web page and
via RSS.

gitbuilder does take a shortcut: if commit x passes and commit x+10
passes, it doesn't bother to test commit x+1..9.  However, if x+10
fails, it bisects automatically to find the first commit that caused a
failure.  You could disable this shortcut easily enough, however.

Have fun,

Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]