Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: Use mozilla-sha1 copyright and license information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/8/24 Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>:
>
> The Mozilla SHA1 is already removed from the tree in "next", and
> block-sha1/sha1.c header modified accordingly.
>
> As there is nothing remaining from the Mozilla SHA1 code, I don't think
> copying that Mozilla License block verbatim is appropriate.  As Linus
> has put it himself, the Mozilla SHA1 code was more inspirational than
> anything else.
>
> And even if some license claim could be made, the MPL section was
> deleted anyway (as explicitly allowed), meaning that only the GPL (by
> vertu of being included in a GPL project) would then apply.
>
> A question was recently sent to all contributors (see the mail
> archive) to determine if they
> would agree
> to a relicensing of that code to make wider license compatibility.
> George Spelvin even rewrote that code as well with the goal of
> putting his version in the public domain.  No definitive conclusion
> emerged so far though.
>
> Therefore I don't think this patch is appropriate.

Agreed. I just didn't look into next.

Ulrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]