Re: [PATCH] gitweb: pull ref markes pull out of subject <a> tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

> Since 4afbaefffa9095fe1391b4b61289a7dc954e9f7b ref markers that
> accompain the subject in views such as shortlog and history point to
> something different from the subject itself. Therefore, they should not
> be included in the same <a> tag.
> 
> Benefits of the change are:
> * better compliance to the XHTML standards, that forbid links within
>   links even though the restriction cannot be imposed via DTD; this also
>   benefits visualization in some older browsers;

Yes, some older browsers (like Mozilla 1.7.12, Gecko/20050923) did 
_enforce_ that requirement when served document with XHTML DOCTYPE,
and application/xml+xhtml Content-Type, by moving inner link (A element)
just outside (just after) outer, containing <a> element.

For format_subject_html which you are fixing, and which is used by 
'shortlog', 'history' and 'tags' views this didn't cause much changes
in layout.  But the way gitweb uses git_print_header_div in views such
as 'tree', 'blob' etc., where the outer (containing) link is made into
*block* element[1] by the way of CSS (display: block) makes layout 
(visualisation) very screwed up in older browser.  But I don't expect
you to fix that.

[1] Originally so the area to click is larger.

> * when hovering the subject, only the subject itself is underlined; when
>   hovering the ref markers, only the text in the hovered ref marker is
>   underlined; previously, hovering any written part of the subject
>   column led to complete underlying of everything at the same time,
>   with unpleasing effects.

Signoff?

Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  gitweb/gitweb.perl |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> The next step would be to find a way to layout decently the case when
> some shortlog entries have a _humongous_ amount of ref markers. See
> for example http://git.oblomov.eu/acecad/shortlog
> 
> I honestly doubt these cases happen in normal git repositories, but it
> might still be worth taking them into consideration. Possibilities
> include hard-limiting the title column maximum width (in browsers for
> which the corresponding attributes and rules work), manual insertion of
> hard line breaks <br/> every n-th ref marker, or something more dynamic
> such as hiding most of the ref markers when they are more than, say, 5,
> and showing them on hover.
> 
> Suggestions? Comments?

Perhaps limiting to heads and tags if there are too many refs?

> 
> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> index ce6e8f6..bb9648b 100755
> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> @@ -1524,10 +1524,10 @@ sub format_subject_html {
>  		$long =~ s/[[:cntrl:]]/?/g;
>  		return $cgi->a({-href => $href, -class => "list subject",
>  		                -title => to_utf8($long)},
> -		       esc_html($short) . $extra);
> +		       esc_html($short)) . $extra;
>  	} else {
>  		return $cgi->a({-href => $href, -class => "list subject"},
> -		       esc_html($long)  . $extra);
> +		       esc_html($long)) . $extra;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.3.rc1.192.gdbfcb
> 
> 

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]